Archive for April, 2006

concrete evidence

Thursday, April 13th, 2006

Memories pour from 43 year old chairs like sweat from a glass blower’s arse. Used wisely they are tools for dislodging anecdotal diamonds from the deepest mines of architectural history. Returning from the book shop at lunch, clutching my RIBA bag containing William Curtis’ book on Denys Lasdun, an unattractive degree of smugness causes me to once more bring up the topic of the chair.

day-3 day-2 day-1

Tony once went for a job interview. I remember visiting his office in a terraced house and waiting in the hall on a collapsable chair - it almost did collapse! - and then I went into Lasdun’s drawing room, which actually was his drawing room with a couple of boards that he worked on, there was a desk and sofa - perhaps it’s yours now - and he said that he was sorry but he didn’t have any work for me, so I asked him why he’d agreed to see me if that was the case and he just said he was interested in seeing what I had - who else had I had offers from he said, John Madin I said, then I should go and work for him he said, he knows the business.

So that’s what he did. John Madin’s office turned out some of Birmingham’s finest post-war architecture and then after a while Tony left, won a competition and built the Ballymena County Hall. You can see it in a 1971 issue of the AJ.

Brutalism doesn’t do ornament. Ornament hides a multitude of sins. Like rain streaks that piss down the surface of concrete and cause you take your eye off the ball. What ball? The volumes, the solids, the voids. I remember, suddenly, as Tony flicks past the images of his era, lifting my camera to point at the underbelly of the National Theatre as a fresh faced clueless undergraduate and being, for the first time, moved. And relieved. Relieved that I’d filled my 35mm with black and white film.

There was a guy says Tony, called William Mitchell, who did sculptures in concrete for the facades of buildings. All I can think of is the guy at MIT, but for the moment I keep that to myself. I once went to a lecture he gave and heard him talk about the first time he started thinking about ornament and facades. He was on a train and as it passed under a bridge the history of the smoke patterns billowing over the surface above had brought the surface of the wall into greater relief. That’s when he first got the idea. He told us about failed experiments with mangles where they would put concrete on boards and feed it between rollers with patterns cut into them. They got in a mess until they realised it was better to keep the concrete still and move the rollers.

We Google for him. It turns out he has his own dot com: william-mitchell.com.

Lunch ends. I sat on the 43 year old chair this evening and ate chicken and noodles whilst memories poured from the leather like sweat from - no, wait, I said that already.

all of the above

Wednesday, April 12th, 2006

Blogging is the topic of this week’s Architest in Building Design magazine:

4) According to www.doyouwantcoffee.blogspot.com, why do architects need blogs?

A Their jobs are boring
B They need biased information
C They have an egotistical need to talk about themselves
D They don’t

Take the full test at bdonline.co.uk (requires registration)

‘nother name

Wednesday, April 12th, 2006

To jog your memory further, Adam has reminded me that this also used to be called ‘Webstalker’.

concept

Wednesday, April 12th, 2006

I should explain my choice of image. I’m talking primarily about the early diagrammatic, conceptual level of idea exploration. The level at which the softness (4B) of the pencil and the amount of pressure you apply through your fingertips has a direct influence on the outcome. The sketch is from a house design I was recently working on and represents a key turning point in the process. The action of drawing those ellipses (having chosen to rotate my thoughts and the client’s actions through 45 degrees) some slowly, some fast, some darker, some lighter, was as important as the result itself. Months later, I still remember the action as much as the image and if the project goes ahead the memory will still be there to call upon when I’m stood on site talking about where to put the plug sockets.

It seemed important to say this, as that evening I went home and had fun briskly drawing up some ideas in Sketchup. Drawing up.

Jack understands the value of pencils too.

Masterclass

Tuesday, April 11th, 2006

Live in New York? Get free tuition from Rafael Viñoly:

Offered for a second time, the four-month course develops the operational and intellectual instruments that form the basis of professional practice. Without substituting for a formal architectural education, weekly classes are addressed to advanced students and practicing architects who find a significant gap between their formative instruction and the challenges they face as professionals. The course is designed around the idea that architectural know-how is not an intuitive ability that comes only with experience but a body of knowledge that can be taught. Once-a-week classes, taught principally by Rafael Viñoly, begin in September, 2006.

Wow. I look forward to him opening his Wolverhampton office.

quick one off the wrist

Monday, April 10th, 2006

‘Design software weakens classic drawing skills’ says Jim Christie in the Washington Post (via ArchNewsNow).

Abso-bloody-lutely says I. Agree with the article whole heartedly, however, this section championing the role of CAD, actually does the opposite.

Computer graphics allow artists to move briskly. By contrast, drawing on paper can be frustrating, forcing concentration, introspection and revision as an idea or vision takes shape.

Firstly, there’s not a way made that I can get my PC to move as fast as the speed I need things to move from my brain to the page. Briskly maybe, but not nearly briskly enough.

Secondly, frustration, forced concentration, introspection and revisions of an idea or vision are all conditions that should be sought out and embraced. Not eradicated with ctrl-z.

lay_02

Related categories: sketches.

iod4

Monday, April 10th, 2006

Does anybody know if iod4, or a similar piece of software, is still going anywhere?

iod4

The original never made it past Windows ‘95: I/O/D 4

(image from an old experiment)

Pritzker price

Friday, April 7th, 2006

Over at gravestmor.com, Marcus is agog at the rates ($3000 dollars a night) at a new hotel being designed by Glen Murcutt:

…it got me thinking about whether or not this is the going rate to stay in accomodation designed by Pritzker and/or Guru Architects. And so below is a woefully incomplete list of boutique accomodation. Note that in each case the most expensive option has been taken.

He’s looking for additions to the list.

How about some more Corbusier? Head to the Unite d’Habitation in Marseilles and you can get a 5 personnes grand chambre for the very reasonable price of 135 Euros.

See: http://www.hotellecorbusier.com/ and read more at greatbuildings.com.

bleu

Thursday, April 6th, 2006

“How nice he is! How gallant! Why the boy’s a bit of a ladies’ man already: he takes after his uncle. He’ll be a perfect gentleman,”, she added, clenching her teeth to give the phrase a slightly British accent. “Couldn’t he come have a cup of tea with me sometime, as our neighbours the English say? He need only send me a ‘blue’ in the morning.”

Travelled to Paris. Sent you some pictures. Visited the Shakespeare and Company book shop.

DSC00353

Bought some Proust. Seemed like I had little choice.

DSC00352

Learnt, on the tram home today, via the footnotes to the above quote, that a ‘blue’ was an express letter transmitted by pneumatic tube within Paris.

Learnt, later, at my desk thirty minutes ago, via bloglines.com, that Matt Webb’s latest post - a wonderful collection of slides from some recent teaching he did - covers the very same topic.

See slide 26 of Fictional Futures. Better yet, read the whole thing, it’s a rich seam of ideas.


There’ll be more on Paris. Probably more Proust. In the meantime you’re welcome to peruse some of the other pictures I took: Paris, April 2006.

both/and

Thursday, April 6th, 2006

Via ArchNewsNow - fantastic piece on housing over Metropolis magazine:

Forget the rampant aestheticism and architectural blinders of the twentieth century. We live in a pluralistic age, and it demands a new pragmatism. We are beyond “either/or”–we live in a world of “both/and.” The issues are quality, habitability, and sustainability, not style du jour. The issue is real urbanism, not some polite, politically palatable “lite” version thereof. I’ll take good New Urbanism, just like I’ll take good Modernism. But it’s not about the starchitects and their ideologies anymore. Can’t the catfighting parties on the different ends of the aesthetic spectrum just grow up and get along?

See also: The Way Forward at That Brutal Joint